1. He has to get up early and I suddenly realize I forgot to set up the coffee.

    I slip out of bed as quietly as I can and do it in the dark, getting water from the fountain in the hallway, doling out the grounds, setting the timer; the motions practiced, the buttons memorized.

    He shifts in his sleep, his hands feeling out the space where I should be. I climb up beside him and his arms find me easily.

    In the morning I can hear him dressing before I open my eyes; a zipper, a belt buckle. “There’s coffee,” I say into my pillow, and he leans over to kiss the corner of my mouth. “I love you too,” he says, and I can’t tell if he misheard me or not.

    I love the way the back of his hair sticks up in the morning.

    I love the way he reaches for me in the middle of the night.

  2. sublim-ature:

Washington D.CD. Eugene Lee

    sublim-ature:

    Washington D.C
    D. Eugene Lee

  3. blvckchlorophyll:

shenanig4ns:


Halls has no chill

b y e

oh
my
god

    blvckchlorophyll:

    shenanig4ns:

    Halls has no chill

    b y e

    oh

    my

    god

  4. skinny-depression:

just want to hug him every second of every day

    skinny-depression:

    just want to hug him every second of every day

  5. fezzesareqool:

urulokid:

millika:

Who’s Alex?
Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.
English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 
This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 
A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 
Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

I reblogged this already but it got better.

    fezzesareqool:

    urulokid:

    millika:

    Who’s Alex?

    Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

    Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.

    English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 

    This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 

    A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 

    Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

    image

    Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

    I reblogged this already but it got better.

  6. yeahwriters:

    tardiscrash:

    Let’s be real, in a time before the internet people didn’t have more adventures and make more meaningful connections. They watched TV and listened to CDs. Before that they listened to records and read magazines. Before that they listened to the radio and read bad dime novels. Before that they embroidered or some shit.

    People have been staying inside and ignoring other people for as long as there have been buildings. 

    I think we all needed this

  7. krazekhaos:

    typette:

    perchu:

    underthesymmetree:

    Fibonacci you crazy bastard….

    As seen in the solar system (by no ridiculous coincidence), Earth orbits the Sun 8 times in the same period that Venus orbits the Sun 13 times! Drawing a line between Earth & Venus every week results in a spectacular FIVE side symmetry!!

    Lets bring up those Fibonacci numbers again: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34..

    So if we imagine planets with Fibonacci orbits, do they create Fibonacci symmetries?!

    You bet!! Depicted here is a:

    • 2 sided symmetry (5 orbits x 3 orbits)
    • 3 sided symmetry (8 orbits x 5 orbits)
    • sided symmetry (13 orbits x 8 orbits) - like Earth & Venus
    • sided symmetry (21 orbits x 13 orbits)

    I wonder if relationships like this exist somewhere in the universe….

    Read the Book    |    Follow    |    Hi-Res    -2-    -3-    -5-    -8-

    i dofnt know what any of this means but these gifs are so raw im gonna rbelog it anyway

    the fibonacci sequence is as close to a universe easter egg as we can possibly get. it’s a repeating pattern of numbers that you see fucking everywhere!

    it appears in shit like this, from things like mathematic fractals, to the way fruits and plants grow, to the golden ratio that ALL of our proportions fit into, and a ton of other totally unrelated fucking things like the bending of light through water, how veins, rivers and lightning are connected in pattern shapes, and so on and so on

    some people say it’s evidence of god, some people say it’s an artifact of us 3D beings travelling through higher dimensions, many agree it’s the truest essence of beauty and the connection between math, science and artwork…

    its p. neat tho you gotta admit

    turbzbnasty
  8. memeterprise:

wrecked

    memeterprise:

    wrecked

  9. michaellamartin:

untitled1306

    michaellamartin:

    untitled1306

  10. gayleafcrime:

    gayleafcrime:

    im going to search random keysmashes on my computer and combine the first 5 images i get in photoshop

    image

  11. xiza:

spenceromg:

vuoen:

vaxpur:

antiquitie:

swinq:

yooo this looks dope on your blog

it really does

ugh

preach it tegs this is the sexiest thing I’ve seen in ages

mmmm

follow for similar posts

    xiza:

    spenceromg:

    vuoen:

    vaxpur:

    antiquitie:

    swinq:

    yooo this looks dope on your blog

    it really does

    ugh

    preach it tegs this is the sexiest thing I’ve seen in ages

    mmmm

    follow for similar posts

  12. atraversso:

    Nature by SamAlive

    Please don’t delete the link to the photographers/artists, thanks!

  13. teatimeforhatter:

edwardspoonhands:

everythingelsegoesherethen:


BLOWJOBS IN THE DUNGEON 
BLOWJOBS IN THE DUNGEON

THIS IS THE BEST HARRY POTTER THING I WILL EVER FUCKING REBLOG THERE ISN’T EVEN A CONTEST I SHIT YOU NOT

OK, no offense you guys, but have you ever participated in oral sex? It is very difficult to do when both people are standing up…

And we all know it’s not like Dobby’s not wearing shoes…

    teatimeforhatter:

    edwardspoonhands:

    everythingelsegoesherethen:

    BLOWJOBS IN THE DUNGEON 

    BLOWJOBS IN THE DUNGEON

    THIS IS THE BEST HARRY POTTER THING I WILL EVER FUCKING REBLOG THERE ISN’T EVEN A CONTEST I SHIT YOU NOT

    OK, no offense you guys, but have you ever participated in oral sex? It is very difficult to do when both people are standing up…

    And we all know it’s not like Dobby’s not wearing shoes…

About me

Welcome to my blog; here's your kitty gif and your platypus & have a nice day.

fuck(s) I do not give

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Emily ∙ 20 ∙ Bi ∙ Taken

Jamaica originally;

DC usually;

Ohio currently;

New Orleans eventually

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Shannon

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jamaica    USA    Ireland    UK

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sort By Tag:

Hot Guys ∙ Hot Girls

Fluffy Things ∙ Drunken Things

Wish List ∙ Bucket List

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Webcomics

Fire For Effect

Questionable Content

Cyanide & Happiness

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

XKCD

Girls With Slingshots

Dumbing of Age